Co-Living London vs. Traditional Renting: Which Gives You More for Your Money?

Renting in London has never been straightforward. Lots of demand, high rents, and the endless hidden extras, from council tax, utilities and broadband to cleaning, can make it hard to know if you’re really getting value for money. With the rise of co-living London schemes, many renters are starting to question whether traditional renting is still the best option.

So, how do the two compare, and which actually gives you more for your money?

The Cost of Traditional Renting in London

On the surface, a traditional rental in London might seem cheaper. You see the monthly rent on Rightmove or Zoopla, and it looks manageable—until you factor in everything else.

  • Bills: Gas, electricity, water, and broadband can add hundreds of pounds a month.
  • Council tax: Another cost that varies but rarely comes cheap in London.
  • Furnishings and appliances: Many flats are let unfurnished, so the outlay on furniture can be substantial.
  • Maintenance headaches: Boiler broken? That’s often days (or weeks) of chasing a landlord or agent.
  • The reality is that the “headline rent” is rarely the final figure. Once you add in these extras, traditional renting can feel like death by a thousand cuts.

Co-Living in London: A Different Way to Rent 

By contrast, co-living London communities are designed to make life simpler and often better value. At Folk, we offer all bills included apartments London style, meaning one monthly payment covers rent and:

  • Your own fully furnished studio apartment
  • Utilities
  • High-speed Wi-Fi
  • Council tax
  • Access to shared amenities like gyms, lounges, co-working spaces and a regular resident events programme 
  • A 24/7 onsite team 

This “all-in” model not only gives clarity on your monthly spend but also provides access to spaces and services you simply wouldn’t get in a typical flat share or private rental.

Lifestyle Value vs. Just Rent

The real difference lies in what you get for your money beyond just four walls.

  • Community: Traditional renting can be isolating, especially in London, where neighbours may never interact. Co-living is built around connection, with regular resident events, shared spaces, and the chance to meet people across industries and backgrounds.
  • Flexibility: While many private landlords insist on 12-month contracts, co-living often offers more flexible terms: perfect for London’s fast-moving lifestyles.
  • Amenities: Think cinema rooms, gyms, yoga studios, games rooms, and even pet spas. In traditional rentals, you’d pay separately for memberships and services that co-living integrates into your rent.

So, Which Is Better Value? 

When you look beyond just the monthly rent figure, co-living London usually stacks up better. The simplicity of all bills included apartments Londoncombined with premium amenities and a built-in community, means you’re not just paying for a place to sleep—you’re paying for a lifestyle.

Traditional renting can work if you want maximum privacy, or if you happen to find a rare bargain. But for most young professionals and creatives in the capital, co-living offers more value, less hassle, and a richer experience of city life.

If you’re weighing up co-living London vs. traditional renting, the question isn’t just “what’s cheapest?” It’s “what gives me the most for my money?” For many, that answer is co-living.

Ready to see if it’s right for you? Contact Folk today to learn more or arrange a tour.

Stay in the loop

Envelope